IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. CHANDURKAR, M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
Harshi Ramjiyani - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 10643 of 2023
Decided On : 03-02-2025
JUDGMENT :
M.M. SATHAYE, J.
1. The challenge raised in this petition is to the order dated 30/08/2022 passed by Respondent No.2 – University, by which the Petitioner has been held ‘not eligible’ for pursuing the degree course of B.Voc. (Interior Design).
2. Few facts necessary for the disposal of this petition, are as under. The Petitioner completed her schooling till 10th grade and thereafter, two years of International Baccalaureate (“IB’ for short) Diploma programme from R.B.K. Education Institute, Kanakia International School, Chembur. The Petitioner gave her 12th IB board examination in April 2019 and her results were awaited. Since the admission process of many colleges usually commence prior to the assessment and announcement of the final IB board result, the IB Board students are allowed to apply to the colleges after receiving a temporary/provisional eligibility certificate from the University. The Petitioner accordingly applied for eligibility certificate on 13/05/2019 for the course of B.A., asserting that she has appeared IBDP-2 exam. This was based on ‘predicted grades’ of the Petitioner under the IB programme, as per certificate which is produced on record by the University, along with its affidavit-in-rely (Page 124). Apparently, this is an undated certificate predicting that the Petitioner will secure total 25 points. Pursuant to this application, Respondent No.2 – University issued a ‘prima facie eligibility certificate’ for admission to First year B.A./ B.M.S./ B.Com/ B.Com.(A&F)/ B.Com.(B&I)/ B.Com.(F.M.)/ B.M.M degree course for the academic year 2019-20, ‘subject to condition that the Petitioner must have to full pass in IB Diploma with minimum 24 credit points as show, in the predicted mark-sheet’.
3. The case of the Petitioner is as under. She visited Respondent No.3 – College inquiring about courses and she was informed that eligibility for the said course of B.Voc. (Interior Design) was 12th college certificate and passing of aptitude test. The Petitioner accordingly applied for B.Voc Interior Design degree course and gave an aptitude test. However, due to her low score in the aptitude test, she did not qualify. The college thereafter informed about an alternative that the Petitioner can take admission in Certified Course of School of Interior Design which does not require aptitude test for the current academic year 2019-20 and in the next year she can again give entrance examination for first year of B.Voc degree course. The Petitioner accordingly took admission in first year of certified course. After completing first year of certified course, the Petitioner followed the process for admission in first year of B.Voc Interior Design degree course for the academic year 2020-21 and applied on the website of the University and uploaded all the documents. The Petitioner thereafter again appeared for aptitude test for admission in B.Voc Interior Design degree course for the year academic year 2020-21, but did not score requisite marks. She was informed that she cannot be allotted a seat in the degree course. The Petitioner was asked to visit the College. On such visit with her parents, the College informed that it has certain seats reserved for management quota. Accordingly, a meeting was held between the Trustees of the College and the Petitioner’s parents and thereafter, the Petitioner was allowed a seat in the first year of B.Voc degree course from management quota. The Petitioner thereafter, completed her first year 2020-21 online due to pandemic and the Petitioner was promoted to second year of B.Voc Interior Design course. The Petitioner thereafter appeared for her exam of 3rd and 4th semesters. She could not pass all subjects but was permitted on ATKT basis (allowed to keep term). Thereafter, the Petitioner was to appear for ATKT exams when she got an email with a letter of the impugned decision from the Respondent – University, stating that her admission in B.Voc Interior Design degree course stands can
The court upheld the university's eligibility criteria, stating that provisional eligibility based on predicted scores does not require lowering cut-off standards if actual scores are insufficient.
The eligibility criteria for admission to educational courses must be based on the regulations in effect at the time of admission, and retrospective application of new criteria is not permissible.
Candidates must strictly adhere to eligibility criteria as outlined in the university's prospectus, and institutions are justified in cancelling admissions if these criteria are not met.
Court upheld that ITI course can be considered equivalent to 12th standard for admission to law programs, challenging restrictive admissions criteria of the University.
Educational institutions cannot withhold results based on procedural errors after allowing students to take examinations, emphasizing the need for adherence to statutory obligations.
Eligibility criteria for academic admissions cannot be altered after the admission process has commenced, ensuring fairness in selection.
An ITI qualification can be considered equivalent to the Pre-University course for admission to a three-year LL.B. program, per prior judicial decisions.
Unless shown to be plainly arbitrary or discriminatory, the court would defer to the wisdom of administrators in academic institutions who might devise policies in regard to curricular admission proc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.