SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1361

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. CHANDURKAR, M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
Harshi Ramjiyani - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 10643 of 2023
Decided On : 03-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sakshi Mane
For the Respondents: Reena A. Salunkhe, Girish J. Paryani, Abhishek Ingale, Pradeep Kumar, C.R. Naidu

The court upheld the university's eligibility criteria, stating that provisional eligibility based on predicted scores does not require lowering cut-off standards if actual scores are insufficient.

Headnote:(A) Education Law - Eligibility Criteria - The Petitioner challenged the University’s decision declaring her ineligible for B.Voc. (Interior Design) due to not meeting the minimum 24 IB points requirement. The Court found the University’s insistence on this criterion justified and noted that provisional eligibility was based on predicted scores. (Paras 10, 11, 12)

(B) Provisional Eligibility - The Court ruled that provisional eligibility based on predicted marks does not obligate the University to lower cut-off standards if actual scores do not meet requirements. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner completed her schooling and applied for eligibility based on predicted grades, but ultimately did not meet the required points for admission.

Findings of Court:
The University’s decision to declare the Petitioner ineligible was justified as she failed to meet the minimum score requirement.

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the University’s eligibility criteria and the implications of predicted scores.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the University is not required to adjust eligibility standards based on predicted scores if actual performance does not meet the criteria.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

M.M. SATHAYE, J.

1. The challenge raised in this petition is to the order dated 30/08/2022 passed by Respondent No.2 – University, by which the Petitioner has been held ‘not eligible’ for pursuing the degree course of B.Voc. (Interior Design).

2. Few facts necessary for the disposal of this petition, are as under. The Petitioner completed her schooling till 10th grade and thereafter, two years of International Baccalaureate (“IB’ for short) Diploma programme from R.B.K. Education Institute, Kanakia International School, Chembur. The Petitioner gave her 12th IB board examination in April 2019 and her results were awaited. Since the admission process of many colleges usually commence prior to the assessment and announcement of the final IB board result, the IB Board students are allowed to apply to the colleges after receiving a temporary/provisional eligibility certificate from the University. The Petitioner accordingly applied for eligibility certificate on 13/05/2019 for the course of B.A., asserting that she has appeared IBDP-2 exam. This was based on ‘predicted grades’ of the Petitioner under the IB programme, as per certificate which is produced on record by the University, along with its affidavit-in-rely (Page 124). Apparently, this is an undated certificate predicting that the Petitioner will secure total 25 points. Pursuant to this application, Respondent No.2 – University issued a ‘prima facie eligibility certificate’ for admission to First year B.A./ B.M.S./ B.Com/ B.Com.(A&F)/ B.Com.(B&I)/ B.Com.(F.M.)/ B.M.M degree course for the academic year 2019-20, ‘subject to condition that the Petitioner must have to full pass in IB Diploma with minimum 24 credit points as show, in the predicted mark-sheet’.

3. The case of the Petitioner is as under. She visited Respondent No.3 – College inquiring about courses and she was informed that eligibility for the said course of B.Voc. (Interior Design) was 12th college certificate and passing of aptitude test. The Petitioner accordingly applied for B.Voc Interior Design degree course and gave an aptitude test. However, due to her low score in the aptitude test, she did not qualify. The college thereafter informed about an alternative that the Petitioner can take admission in Certified Course of School of Interior Design which does not require aptitude test for the current academic year 2019-20 and in the next year she can again give entrance examination for first year of B.Voc degree course. The Petitioner accordingly took admission in first year of certified course. After completing first year of certified course, the Petitioner followed the process for admission in first year of B.Voc Interior Design degree course for the academic year 2020-21 and applied on the website of the University and uploaded all the documents. The Petitioner thereafter again appeared for aptitude test for admission in B.Voc Interior Design degree course for the year academic year 2020-21, but did not score requisite marks. She was informed that she cannot be allotted a seat in the degree course. The Petitioner was asked to visit the College. On such visit with her parents, the College informed that it has certain seats reserved for management quota. Accordingly, a meeting was held between the Trustees of the College and the Petitioner’s parents and thereafter, the Petitioner was allowed a seat in the first year of B.Voc degree course from management quota. The Petitioner thereafter, completed her first year 2020-21 online due to pandemic and the Petitioner was promoted to second year of B.Voc Interior Design course. The Petitioner thereafter appeared for her exam of 3rd and 4th semesters. She could not pass all subjects but was permitted on ATKT basis (allowed to keep term). Thereafter, the Petitioner was to appear for ATKT exams when she got an email with a letter of the impugned decision from the Respondent – University, stating that her admission in B.Voc Interior Design degree course stands can

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top