SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1378

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali - Appellant 
Vs.
Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr. - Respondent  
Criminal Bail Application No.2430 Of 2025
Decided On : 05-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Adv. Jugal Kanani i/b. Adv. Prabanjay R. Dave
For the Respondent: Mrs. Manisha Jagtap a/w Ms. Yashashree Raut, Mrs. Sangeeta Shinde, APP

The acceptance of fraudulent documents to establish shell companies qualifies the resulting funds as 'proceeds of crime' under the PMLA, necessitating rejection of bail due to the applicant's significant involvement in illegal financial activities.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 318(4), 338, 340(2) - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Allegations of cheating and money laundering through shell companies - The applicant's bail application is rejected by the court, as prima facie evidence indicates his involvement in the establishment of shell companies and illegal transactions, thereby qualifying the funds in question as 'proceeds of crime' under the PMLA. (Paras 1-14)

(B) Definition of Proceeds of Crime - The court asserts that property derived from criminal activity related to a scheduled offence must be strictly interpreted under the PMLA, reaffirming that wrongfully obtained property qualifies as proceeds of crime when linked to scheduled offences, as indicated in relevant case law. (Paras 7, 12).

Facts of the case:
The applicant was arrested for being implicated in a scheme involving the establishment of shell companies using fraudulent KYC documents, leading to illegal financial transactions exceeding Rs.112.72 Crores linked to gambling and fraudulent activities. (Paras 3.1-3.5) Findings of the Court: The investigation showed that the applicant, along with co-accused, established shell companies using documents obtained under false pretenses, leading to large amounts of transactions deemed as proceeds of crime. (Paras 6-11)

Issues: Whether the evidence presented establishes a prima facie case of the alleged offences under the BNS and the PMLA? (Paras 6)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the nature of the deception and the resulting financial transactions conclusively linked the funds to the commission of scheduled offences, justifying the rejection of bail. (Paras 14)

Result: Application rejected.

Table of Content
1. criminal allegations of money laundering. (Para 1 , 3)
2. defenses regarding lack of proceeds of crime. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis of deception in financial transactions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. conclusion on money laundering per pmla definitions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

1JUDGMENT :

SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.

1. This bail application arises on account of rejection of the application for bail filed by the Applicant before the trial Court invoking Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) r/w Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”), in an ECIR bearing No.ECIR/MBZO-II/20/2024.

Respondent No.1 filed an Affidavit-in-Reply and opposed this application.

2. Heard Mr. Aabad Ponda, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Ms. Manisha Jagtap, the learned Special PP for Respondent No.1-ED. Perused the Application, the reply and the written submissions presented by the respective Counsel.

3. Based on an F.I.R. bearing No.295 of 2024, dated 07/11/2024 under Sections 318 (4) 338, 340 (2) of BNS, 2023, registered with Malegaon Chawani Police Station, Nashik, Respondent No.1 has registered the said ECIR bearing No.ECIR/MBZO-II/20/2024 on 11/11/2024.

3.1 Said F.I.R. No.295 of 2024 was registered on the complaint filed by Jayesh Lotan Misal, wherein it is stated that one Seraj Ahmed Mohammad Harun Memon had collected the documents of identity from the informant, his brother Ganesh Misal and some other persons in the guise of giving them a financial benefit, .i.e., a job in APMC, Malegaon. Said Seraj Ahmed and his accomplices then used those documents to establish shell entities. Further, certain bank accounts were opened in NAMCO Bank, Malegaon, Nashik in the name of such shell entities. It is alleged that, in addition, Seraj Ahmed acquired new SIM Cards in the name of the informant and others and linked the SIM Cards with those bank accounts for the purpose of taking control and to operate those bank accounts. Later on, the said bank accounts were used to carry financial transactions including circular transactions running into hundreds of cores and also to make term deposits from that money. Investigation revealed that in all 14 such bank accounts were opened with said NAMCO Bank in the name of different shell entities by said Mr. Seraj Ahmed.

3.2 The transaction statements, account opening forms, KYC documents etc. of said 14 bank accounts revealed that, credits amounting to more than Rs.112.72 Crores approx. were made from the accounts of around 200 firms/companies, within a span of 1 to 2 months only. Immediately after accumulating the amounts by way of such credits, said amounts were transferred to various other accounts maintained in the name of different persons/entities. Majority of the amount was transferred through online banking including RTGS/NEFT/IMPS. Out of the credited amounts, three fixed deposits were created in said NAMCO Bank in the name of Pratik P. Jadhav, Ganesh L. Mishal and Jayesh L. Mishal, who were proprietors of M/s Choice Marketing, M/s Red Rose Trading Co. and M/s Sunrise Traders, respectively.

3.3 Five such accounts were maintained with the Bank of Maharashtra in the name of M/s. Dhanraj Agro, M/s. Red Rose Trading Co., M/s. Choice Marketing, M/s. Megha Traders and M/s. Sunrise Traders, which were established by said Siraj Ahmed with the help of the documents of identity of i) Moin Khan Ismail Khan, ii) Ganesh Lothan Misal, iii) Pratik Popat Jadhav, iv) Manoj Gorakh Misal, and v) Jayesh Lotan Misal, respectively. Rs.45.06 crores approx. were received in these five accounts from the accounts of various firms/companies within 3-4 months. Immediately, the amounts so credited in those accounts were transferred to several other accounts maintained in the name of various entities.

3.4 An analysis of the bank accounts of M/s. Hardik Enterprises and M/s. Haresh Trading Co. maintained with Axis Bank revealed that cash amounting to Rs.28,22,00,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top