SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1492

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.I. CHAGLA J.
Federal Express Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Fedex Securities Private Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Interim Application No. 820 of 2021, COMM IPR Suit No. 1406 of 2019
Decided On : 11-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Veerendra Tulzapurkar, Ameya Gokhale, Rishabh Jaisani, Dhruv Grover, Harit Lakhan, Abhineet Kalia, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, Abhay J.V.
For the Respondents: Alankar Kirpekar, Shekhar Bhagat, Ayush Tiwari, Rajas Panandikar, Shekhar Bhagat

Trademark infringement occurs when a defendant uses a well-known mark in bad faith, causing confusion, irrespective of the addition of non-distinctive terms. The plaintiff is entitled to injunction based on established reputation and dishonesty in mark adoption.

Headnote:(A) Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 27, 28, 29(2), 29(4), 29(5) and 134 - Dispute regarding trademark 'FEDEX' - Applicant seeks injunction against Defendants for infringing the trademark 'FEDEX' - The mark has been registered by Applicant since 1986 and declared well-known in India - Defendants' use of the mark in their corporate names amounts to infringement and passing off, irrespective of their defense under Section 159(5) - The court establishes that mere addition of 'Securities' does not create distinction in the context of infringement - Plaintiff established a strong prima facie case of dishonesty and confusion in the market. (Paras 1, 3, 70, 85, 87)

(B) Trademark Infringement - No need to prove use to maintain an action for infringement - The presence and reputation of the trademark established prior to the defendants' registration are sufficient for a claim. (Paras 4, 73, 84)

(C) Passing off action - Plaintiff need not establish common field of activity for passing off; it suffices that there is a likelihood of confusion. (Paras 22, 80)

Table of Content
1. background facts of the trademark dispute. (Para 1 , 2)
2. plaintiff's arguments on infringement and trademark rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. plaintiff's claims regarding well-known status and unfair advantage. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. legal framework for passing off and dilution claims. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. arguments surrounding the defendants' actions and explanations. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. assessment of the defendants' credibility and actions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
7. defendants' substantive arguments against the plaintiff. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
8. defendants' position on confusion and their business model. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
9. court's determination regarding applicability of section 159(5). (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73)
10. court’s findings on trademark distinctiveness and deception. (Para 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83)
11. conclusion on the need for injunctive relief. (Para 84 , 85 , 86)

ORDER :

1. By this Interim Application, the Applicant / Original Plaintiff has sought for an order of injunction restraining the Defendants from using / infringing / passing off the Applicant’s trade mark “FEDEX” and for other consequential relief.

2. A brief background of facts is as under:-

(i) The Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America and is a global leader in providing transportation, e-commerce and business services to customers under its reputed and recognized brand known as FEDEX worldwide and in India.

(ii) On 17th April, 1973, the Plaintiff commenced its operations in providing services to customers and businesses for express transportation and delivery of their consignment under the trade mark / name FEDERAL EXPRESS.

(iii) The Plaintiff completed its first public offering of shares and has been listed on New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol FDX in 1978.

(iv) The Plaintiff surpassed USD 1 billion in revenues, making history as the first Company in USA to reach this financial hallmark within 10 years of start-up without mergers or acquisitions.

(v) The Plaintiff coined and adopted the trade mark FEDEX, which was a natural and popular abbreviation of Plaintiff’s trade mark / name FEDERAL EXPRESS. The Plaintiff obtained registration of the trade mark FEDEX in various jurisdictions such as Australia, New Zealand, Austria, Benelux, France, USA and UK.

(vi) The Plaintiff acquired Gelco Express International, Courier service and with it gained instant presence in 84 countries including India and propagated its name, branding and identity. (vii) In 1985, the Plaintiff doubled its revenue and became a USD 2 billion corporation.

(viii) The Plaintiff registered its trademark in India in Classes 12, 16, 35, 38, 39 and 42 in the year 1986.

(ix) The Plaintiff registered its domain fedex.com on 26th February, 1991.

(x) The Plaintiff formerly adopted FEDEX as its primary brand and distinct symbol for its worldwide identity in the year 1994. (xi) The Plaintiff launched the website www.fedex.com in the year 1994. This was the first transportation website to offer online online package status tracking, enabling customers to discover news about FEDEX, check service availability, download FEDEX software, and trade their package as it moved through global network.

(xii) In 1996 the Plaintiff became the world’s largest express company serving 211 countries and territories and connecting 99% of the world’s economy. The Plaintiff’s Annual Reports on record illustrate, prominent use of such FEDEX branding on or in relation to corporate identity and services on packaging, boxed, business papers, drop-box kiosks, etc. at least from 1990 onwards.

(xiii) The Defendant No.1 was originally incorporated in the State of Karnataka on 16th January, 1995 under the name of Beandaz Properties and Finvest Private Ltd. Defendant No.1 thereafter changed its name to FEDEX SECURITIES PRIVATE LIMITED on 15th March, 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top