SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1520

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SARANG V. KOTWAL, ASHISH SAHADEV CHAVAN
Manuel Borges, Son of Simplicio Borges – Appellant
Versus
Goa State Election Commission, Thr. The Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S. S. Kantak, Senior Adv. with Mr. Abhijit Gosavi, Ms. Neha Kholkar, Mr. Gaurang Kerkar, Ms. Krupa Naik, Ms. Shweta Shetgaonkar and Ms. Saicha Desai, Advs.
For the Respondents:Mr. Somnath Karpe, Advocate with Mr. Anand Shirodkar, Ms. Siddhi Parodkar, Ms. Riddhi Shirodkar, Ms. Samiksha Vaigankar and Ms. Sonali Gaonkar, Advs., Mr. Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Prashil Arolkar, Additional Government Adv. with Ms. Maria Simone Correia, Additional Government Adv., Mr. H. D. Naik, Adv.

Table of Content
1. petitioners challenge reservation notifications (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding triple test compliance (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. respondent's locus standi and census data defense (Para 12 , 14)
4. court discusses article 243-d implications (Para 21 , 22)
5. empirical inquiry and triple test necessity (Para 24 , 25 , 27)
6. court's assessment of commission's report (Para 30 , 32)
7. court dismisses petitions and discharges rule (Para 33 , 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT :

Sarang V. Kotwal, J.

1. Both these Petitions are decided by this common judgment as they challenge the same notification bearing no. 4/64/Reservation- Z.P./-2025-26/SEC/197 dated 06.11.2025 issued by the Goa State Election Commission providing reservation of seats for General Elections to the South Goa, Zilla Panchayat.

2. Heard Mr. Kantak, learned Senior Advocate appearing for both the Petitioners, Mr. Somnath Karpe, learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent no. 1, Mr. Devidas Pangam, learned Advocate General appearing for Respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Mr. Naik, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent no. 4.

3. With consent of the parties, the Petitions are decided finally, hence ‘Rule’. Rule is made returnabl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top