Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ARIF S. DOCTOR
In the matter of Companies Act, 1 of 1956; And In the matter of M/s. Navinon Ltd. (In Liquidation) Zulfikar Akbarali Khoja, (Adult Indian Inhabitant) – Appellant
Versus
Official Liquidator, M/s. Navinon Ltd. (In Liquidation) – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
1. Since the issue that arises for consideration in the Official Liquidator’s Report (“OLR”) and the Interim Application are essentially two sides of the same coin, both the captioned proceedings were, with the consent of the Learned Counsel, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The issue for consideration in both captioned proceedings is the validity of a Deed of Assignment dated 16th May 2019 (“the Deed of Assignment”), which assigned to the Applicants, a plot of land identified as - Lot No. 45, Old Survey No. 113 (Part), New Survey No. 165, measuring approximately 1,497 square metres, located in Tarapur Industrial Area, Boisar, Palghar (“the said land”), along with a building on it (“the said building”). The said land and building are collectively referred to as “the said property”. It is not in dispute that the said propert
Transactions executed after the commencement of winding-up proceedings are void under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act unless validated by the court, reinforcing the need for evidence that such tr....
Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 allows the court to validate bona fide transactions made after the commencement of winding up, emphasizing the importance of protecting legitimate interests ....
The sale of property during winding up proceedings is void if executed without court sanction and with fraudulent intent to evade creditors' claims.
Sale of property by a company before winding up is void against the liquidator if it lacks good faith and adequate consideration, even if transactions are valid inter partes.
Share transfers made after the commencement of winding up are void unless sanctioned by the court, and must be justified as beneficial to the company.
The court established that secured creditors must be included in winding up proceedings to protect their interests in mortgaged properties.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article