SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
B. P. COLABAWALLA, AMIT SATYAVAN JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.
Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Charity Fund - Appellant
Vs.
Income Tax, Officer (Exemption) - Respondent
Writ Petition No.4941 of 2024
Decided On : 07-11-2025

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J. D. Mistri, Senior Advocate, with Jeet Kamdar i/b. Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Dinesh R. Gulabani (through V.C.), Advocate

Reassessment under the Income Tax Act cannot occur solely on a change of opinion without new material; compliance with statutory provisions suffices for valid claims by charitable trusts under Section 11(2).

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 11(2) and Section 148A - Charitable Trust's claim for exemption based on accumulation of income - Notices and order impugned for reopening assessment without any new material or re-evaluation of facts - Court reiterates that non-compliance with Form 10's provision cannot be deemed fatal provided the purpose for accumulation is clear - Petitioner had filed a valid Form 10 prior to the due date outlining the specific purpose of accumulation, supported by resolution. (Paras 14, 20, 27, 31)

(B) Reassessment - Principles governing reassessment under the Income Tax Act - Reassessment cannot be initiated solely based on a change of opinion or for review of previously assessed documents. (Paras 28, 29, 30)

Facts of the case:
The Charitable Trust filed a return for A.Y. 2018-2019 and claimed exemption for accumulated income. Despite passing resolutions for the purpose, notices issued under Section 148A challenged for insufficient specificity were held incorrect.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner complied with Section 11(2) requirements, providing specific purposes and relevant documentation. The assessment reopening lacked any new or tangible material to justify reassessment.

Issues: Were the grounds for reopening valid? Did the Petitioner sufficiently specify the purpose of accumulation?

Ratio Decidendi: The Court found that the Respondent had misapplied the statutory requirements and had no basis to reopen the assessment, emphasizing that compliance with Form 10 related to specificity of purpose was met.

Result: Impugned notices and orders quashed; the Rule is made absolute.

Table of Content
1. impugned notices and order challenged (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. charitable trust's compliance with income tax provisions (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10)
3. arguments on compliance and jurisdiction (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 14)
4. details about form 10 and explanatory requirements (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19)
5. court observations on assessment validity (Para 18 , 21 , 22)
6. assessment procedures and limitations (Para 24 , 26 , 30)
7. final ruling and quashing of notices (Para 31 , 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

(PER Amit Satyavan Jamsandekar, J ).

1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has impugned the Notices dated 9th August 2024 and 20th August 2024, which are issued under Section 148A (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). The relevant Assessment Year (A.Y.) is 2018-2019. Further, the Petitioner has also impugned the order dated 28th August 2024, passed by the 1st Respondent under Section 148A (d) of the Act. The Petitioner has also impugned the Notice dated 28th August 2024 issued by the 1st Respondent under Section 148 of theAct. By the Notice Page 2 of 32 dated 28th August 2024, the 1st Respondent has reopened the assessment of the Petitioner for A.Y. 2018-2019. The Revenue has filed its Reply dated 14th November 2024 to the Petition, which is affirmed on behalf of the 1st and the 2nd Respondent by one Mr. Pravin Kumar. The Petitioner has filed its Rejoinder to the Revenue's Reply.

2. The Pleadings are complete, and therefore, by consent of the parties, we have heard the Petition finally at the admission stage. Accordingly, we issue Rule. The Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally.

3. The facts and circumstances leading to the Notices and the order impugned in the present Petition are as follows :-

i) The Petitioner is a charitable Trust registered under section 12A of the Act. Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy, First Baronet, a Parsi Merchant and a Philanthropist, was the settlor of the Petitioner in 1838.

ii) The Petitioner filed its Return of Income for the A.Y.2018-2019 in which it declared its total income at Rs.1,96,983/-. The Petitioner is assessed in Mumbai. The Petitioner’s Return of Income claimed exemption Page 3 of 32 under Section 11 of the Act. The Petitioner also filed Form No. 10, which contains a statement to be furnished to the Assessing Officer under Section 11 (2) of the Act. It is the case of the Petitioner that along with the statement, the Petitioner also pointed out that the Trustees of the Petitioner have passed a Resolution on 26th September 2018, by which a sum of Rs.3,17,00,000/-, which is 66.72% of the Income of the Petitioner for the A.Y. 2018-2019, would be accumulated or set apart for carrying out the purposes of the Trust. The Petitioner accumulated or set apart this amount for the purposes of medical, education and social relief to the Members of the Zoroastrian community and conservation, maintenance and upkeep of properties till March 31, 2023.

iii) The Petitioner’s case was selected for scrutiny, and the 1st Respondent issued a Notice dated 22nd September 2019 under Section 143 (2) of the Act, read with Rule 12E of the Income Tax Rules, and sought clarification on the issue which is “Accumulation of Income by Trust”.

iv) Thereafter, on 10th January 2020, the 1st Respondent issued notice to the Petitioner under Section 142 (1) of Page 4 of 32 the Act and sought details, as more particularly, mentioned therein, and in particular, the details of accumulation under Section 11 (2), if any, in the last ten years and the details of utilization as per the chart given in the notice. By this notice, the 1st Respondent also sought copies of the Application in Form 10 and the Resolution of Trustees in this regard for each accumulation under section 11(2), in case of an amount spent in the year under consideration.

v) On 30th January 2020, the Petitioner, by its letter, provided a true copy of the Resolution dated 26th September 2018 of the Trustees of the Petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top