IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , JJ.
Shriram S/o Pandurang Dange - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
First Appeal No. 2762, 2763, 2764, 2765, 2766, 1196, 1197 of 2023 With Civil Application No. 3710 of 2023, First Appeal No. 1198 of 2023 With Civil Application No. 3711 of 2023, First Appeal No. 1199 of 2023 With Civil Application No. 3712 of 2023, First Appeal No. 1200 of 2023 With Civil Application No. 3713 of 2023
Decided On : 07-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common judgment overview and initial appeals context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. complainants cite inadequate compensation argument. (Para 3) |
| 3. state contests appellants' claims for higher compensation. (Para 4) |
| 4. consideration of several land sale instances in compensation context. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. court analysis of comparable land instances and considerations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. final compensation adjustments and legal basis articulated. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
(PER SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J):-
1. All these First Appeals are taken up together for disposal by common judgment, since the challenge therein is to the common judgment and award dated 29th April 2022, passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the (5) Reference Court’) in Land Acquisition Reference Nos. 80, 81, 82, 83 of 2012 and 323 of 2017. The first group of five appeals has been preferred by the original land owners, whose lands are acquired for construction of Percolation Tank No.2 at village Babhalgaon, District Latur. In the first group of five appeals, the Special Land Acquisition Officer offered compensation @ Rs. 1394/- per R and 2788/- per R. However, the learned Reference Court partly allowed the Reference Petitions of the appellants/claimants by granting compensation @ Rs. 125/- per sq. ft. along with other statutory benefits. As such, the appellants/claimants preferred these appeals for enhancement of the compensation, by claiming it at the rate of 250 per sq. ft. along with the other statutory benefits. The State too has preferred the other five appeals, i.e. second group for reduction of rate of compensation awarded by the learned Reference Judge.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants/claimants as well as learned A.G.P. for the State in their respective groups of appeals.
3. The learned counsel for the appellants/claimants in first group of five appeals submitted that the impugned judgment is illegal, perverse and inadequate compensation is awarded, since the learned Reference Court failed to consider that the acquired lands were having high potentiality as well as commercial use. According to him, the (6) acquired lands were adjacent to Latur-Nilanga State Highway and surrounded by developed infrastructure. Besides, there were Government facilities in proximity of those lands, such as District headquarters, R.T.O. Office, Police Training Academy, District Police Training Center, Government Rest House, and Primary Health Center. There are also educational institutions, such as Dayanand Senior and Junior College and Vocational College. In addition to that, there are other institutions including Bank, Milk Dairy, Shopping Complex and residential colonies near to the acquired lands. He pointed out that village Babhalgaon is within the Municipal Limits of Latur city with a population of over Ten Thousand and it is developing rapidly. According to him, the learned Reference Judge definitely erred in not considering the comparable sale instances of the same village in respect of Gut No. 28, showing the rates between Rs. 214 to 250 per square feet. Further, according to him, the learned Reference Judge also did not consider the previous judgments wherein higher rate was given to the similar placed lands. He further submitted that, though the learned Reference Judge relied only on the last rate of Rs. 166/- per sq. ft. as reflected from the award in LAR No. 894 of 2009 at Exh.36, but further applied 25% deduction unnecessarily. Thus, he prayed for enhancement at the rate of Rs. 250/- per sq. ft. along with allied statutory benefits.
4. On the contrary, the learned A.G.P. submits that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court in the instant matters is definitely exorbitant and needs further reduction. He pointed out as to how the judgment in First Appeal No. 1459 of 2020 with connected matters cannot be used on the ground of parity. As such, he sought appropriate reduction in
The determination of land compensation must consider comparable sales and surrounding development potential to ensure fair market value.
The potentiality of acquired land and comparable sale instances are crucial for determining fair compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.