SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1744

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.
Mr. Dinesh Chandra Maingi - Appellant 
Vs.
Shivkant V. Chaudhary - Respondent 
Complaint No.3 of 2013 In Company Petition No. 628 of 2008
Decided On : 01-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Shanay Shah, Hamza Lakhani and Tejas Popat for the Official Liquidator. Mr. Akshay Patil i/b Jayesh Gawde, Mr. Pradeep Bakhru, Piyush Kranti i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co.

The failure to file a Statement of Affairs under the Companies Act constitutes a continuing offence, necessitating the prosecution to prove wilful default without reasonable excuse, with the burden of proof not shifting to the accused unless initial facts are established.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Section 454(5) - Failure to submit Statement of Affairs to the Official Liquidator by Ex-Directors of a Company - Charged with offence punishable under Companies Act for non-compliance with statutory obligations under Section 454 - Lapse of time from winding up order, regarded as a continuing offence despite challenges related to limitation - Court finds that the initial burden lies on the prosecution to prove wilful default without reasonable excuse for non-compliance, which was not established by the prosecution - All Accused were acquitted. (Paras 21, 28, 55)

(B) Burden of proof - Necessity for prosecution to prove that failure was without reasonable excuse - Onus does not shift to the Accused unless primary facts established. (Paras 41, 52)

(C) Procedure for evidence - Evidence recorded via affidavit cannot replace mandatory in-court testimonies; failure to object initially rendered challenges to admissibility moot. (Paras 30, 54)

(D) Continuing offence under law - Non-filing of required documents is established as a continuing offence pursuant to statutory provisions and judicial interpretation. (Paras 23, 45)

Table of Content
1. section 454 of companies act outlines obligations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. complaint details the failures of the accused. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. evidence was presented regarding compliance. (Para 8 , 10)
4. arguments on limitation and procedural issues. (Para 13 , 14 , 16)
5. court examines the interpretation of continuing offenses. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. failure to file as a continuing offense established. (Para 27 , 28)
7. burden of proof lies with prosecution on wilful default. (Para 44 , 52)
8. accused acquitted due to failure of prosecution. (Para 54)

Judgment :

Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

1. The Accused are charged with offence punishable under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 [for short “Companies Act”] with imprisonment for term which may extend to two years, or with fine, which may extend to one thousand rupees for every day during which the default continues, or with both. By order of 8th August 2013, process was issued against the Accused.

2. Section 454 of the Companies Act provides for the statement of affairs to be made to the Official Liquidator and Sub-Section (5) of Section 454 reads as under:

“If any person, without reasonable excuse, makes default in complying with any requirements of section, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine which may extend to Rs.1,000/- for every day during which the default continues or with both”

3. The complaint has been filed by the Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Limited. against the Accused. It is stated in the complaint that the Company was ordered to be wound up by order of 19th March 2009 passed by this Court and the Official Liquidator was appointed as Liquidator. The Accused Nos.1 to 4 are the Directors of the Company at the date of winding up order and as such under a statutory obligation under Section 454(1) and (3) of Companies Act to make out and submit to the official liquidator a statement as to the affairs of the Company (in liqn) in the prescribed form duly verified by an affidavit and containing the particulars specified in Sub-Section (1) of Section 454 of the Companies Act, within 21 days from the relevant date or within the time extended by the Court or by the Official Liquidator.

4. The complaint states that notices calling for the meeting and to file the statement of affairs under Section 454 of the Companies Act were issued to the Ex-Directors on 18th June 2009 and 21st July 2009. By order of 15th July 2010, this Court directed the secured creditor and Ex-Directors to furnish the required information in respect of the assets and affairs of company in liquidation. By order of 12th March 2012, this Court had directed the Ex-Directors to file the statement of affairs of the Company and to hand over the books of accounts and records of the company within one week from the date of order to enable the Official Liquidator to proceed further in the winding up proceedings and to inform about the whereabouts of three barges, failing which action be taken under Section 454(5A) of the Companies Act.

5. On 20th March 2012, the Official Liquidator called upon the accused to file the statement of affairs and to inform the whereabouts of three barges taken on hire by the Company from the Petitioning Creditor. The complaint states that by their covering letters dated 22nd March 2012 and 5th April 2012, the Accused submitted copies of balance sheet for the period 2001–2009, vouchers, bank statements of the Company, Central Excise Stock Register, Correspondence and delivery challan.

6. The complaint states that the original documents, the statement of affairs and the required affidavit giving details of whereabouts of three barges have not been filed by the Accused and they have not handed over the books of accounts or records of the company. The copies of documents/records provided do not constitute books of accounts.

7. The complaint in paragraph 8 states that the ex-directors of the company (in



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top