Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.I. CHAGLA
Usha Sunder Premises CHS Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Nilang Desai – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By this Interim Application, the Plaintiff has sought for an injunction restraining the Defendants from (i) in any manner acting upon or committing acts and omissions in furtherance of the impugned documents; (ii) in any manner carrying out any development and/or construction activity or constructing any building or structure on any part or portion of the Plaintiff’s property; (iii) dealing with, transferring, disposing of, alienating, encumbering, creating any third-party rights or parting with possession of any part and/or portion of the Plaintiff’s property and (iv) entering upon and/or remaining upon the larger property which includes the demised property and/or any part thereof.
2. The Plaintiff is a Co-operative Premises Society, consisting of 25 members (most of whom are senior citizens), registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (“MCS Act”).
3. Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are the legal heirs of the late Mrs. Usha Suresh Desai and claim to be lessees in respect of a portion of the Plaintiff’s larger property. Defendant No. 3 (now deceased) is the erstwhile Secretary of the Plaintiff – Society. Defendant No. 4 claims to have been assigned the leased
The doctrine of indoor management applies when parties rely on a validly conferred authority despite allegations of internal irregularities; issues of management are internal and not for external par....
Court ruled that temporary injunctions can enforce development agreements even against minority occupants obstructing redevelopment, especially when prior claims against obstruction were dismissed on....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition of long-standing possession as a basis for protection and the emphasis on due process in property disputes.
The court emphasized that a Title Certificate deemed acceptance of title, and plaintiffs' 18-year delay in seeking interim relief precluded their claims, highlighting the importance of readiness and ....
The court emphasized the need for a careful balance of equities in injunction cases, asserting that blanket injunctions affecting substantial projects must be substantiated with clear justifications.
The court affirmed that fraudulent sale deeds do not confer valid title, and the burden of proof lies on the party alleging fraud, especially in fiduciary relationships.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
