SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1803

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
Saurabh Eknath Ghule – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. – Respondent
Anticipatory Bail Application No.1564 Of 2025 With Interim Application No. 4344 Of 2025, Anticipatory Bail Application No.1570 Of 2025 With Interim Application No.4335 Of 2025, Anticipatory Bail Application No.1651 Of 2025 With Interim Application No. 4342 Of 2025
Decided On : 22-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae), A/w Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate A/w Jugal Kanani
For the Respondent: Mr. S.A. Karmakar, Appellant, Ms. S.M, Yadav, APP, IO, Mr. Santosh Khetmalas, E.O.W., Pune City, present

The court emphasized the necessity for undertakings to fulfill contractual obligations in granting anticipatory bail despite serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406, 409, 420 - Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 5, 8, 13 - Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 - Anticipatory bail applications concerning allegations of misappropriation and cheating in a real estate project. (Para 2)

(B) The court noted that the Applicants undertook to complete the project and handover possession of flats within 14 months, which justified granting anticipatory bail despite the seriousness of the allegations. (Paras 11, 16)

Facts of the case:
The Applicants, part of a construction company, were accused of defrauding a flat buyer and others in a real estate project by failing to deliver flats despite payment. Allegations included misappropriation of funds collected from purchasers. (Paras 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
Anticipatory bail granted subject to conditions ensuring project completion and cooperation with investigations. (Paras 16, 17)

Issues: Whether the Applicants' undertakings to complete the project and refund amounts were sufficient to justify anticipatory bail despite serious allegations of fraud. (Paras 11, 15)

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized the significance of Applicants’ commitment to fulfill contractual obligations and the necessity of ensuring rights of flat purchasers during the proceedings. (Paras 11, 16)

Result: Anticipatory bail applications allowed; conditions imposed for release. (Para 17)

Table of Content
1. factual background of the construction project and payment. (Para 3)
2. arguments regarding the nature of the dispute. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court decisions based on the applicants' undertakings. (Para 8 , 11)
4. considerations for granting anticipatory bail. (Para 10 , 14 , 15)
5. final order granting anticipatory bail. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

1. Heard on earlier dates Mr. Ponda, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1564 of 2025 (Accused No. 4 and 5), Mr. Mundargi, learned Counsel for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1570 of 2025 (Accused No. 1 and 2) and Mr. Nimbalkar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1651 of 2025 (Accused No.3), Ms. Yadav, learned APP and Mr. Karmakar, learned APP, Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar, learned Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Vaibhav Ugale, learned Counsel appointed as amici curiae to represent interest of the flat purchasers and Mr. Budhwani, learned Counsel for the Intervenor.

2. By these Applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“ BNSS ”), the Applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.922 of 2024 registered with Lonikand Police Station, Pune City, for the offences punishable under Sections 406 , 409, 420 read with Section 3 4 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (“IPC”), Sections 3 ,5, 8 and 13 of MAHARASHTRA OWNERSHIP OF FLATS ACT , 1963 (“MOFA”) and under Sections 3 of Maharashrta Protection of Interest of Depositors, Act 1999 (“MPID”).

3. The prosecution case is set out in paragraph Nos. 3(a) to (s) of Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1564 of 2025, which reads as under :

“a. Pranay Prakash Singhi, Sushil Eknath Ghule, Abhijit Vasant Shende and the present Applicants run a construction company known as SSG Realty and Infra LLP and have their offices at Survey Nos. 8/3/2, 8/3/3, Vellore Towers, Keshav Nagar, Mundhwa, Pune (hereinafter referred to as the "said Firm").

b. In the year 2014, the said Firm commenced the construction of a new building project known as 'Suburbia Estate' located at Gat No. 501, Nagar Road, behind Wakefield Company, Lonikand, Pune (hereinafter referred to as the "said Project"). The said Project is registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) bearing RERA registration No. P 52100002391.

c. The Informant learned about the said Project through billboards/hoardings put up in the vicinity of the said Project.

d. Sometime in January 2015, the Informant and his wife visited the office of the said Project for purchasing a flat and met a person named Mr. Deepak Singh from the sales team of the said Firm.

e. Mr. Deepak Singh attended to the Informant and his wife and showed them the said Project and provided them with all the relevant and necessary information in respect of the said Project.

f. During the said visit, the Informant and his wife decided to book a flat in the said Project, being Flat No. 601, 6th Floor, ‘B' Building, admeasuring 61.22 sq.mtr., along with 9.94 sq.mtr. terrace and 9.29 sq.mtr. parking space, costing a total of Rs.36,11,750/- and decided to buy the same at the quoted price (hereinafter referred to as the "said Flat").

g. Accordingly, on 29 January 2015, the Informant paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- via cheque drawn on his bank account with ICICI Bank, Satara Road, Pune, bearing bank account no. 033701500891 in the name of said Firm and booked the said Flat.

h. As far as the balance amount towards the consideration of the said Flat was concerned, the Informant was introduced to the one of the employees of ICICI Bank, namely Mr. Sagar Bhadakwad by Mr. Deepak Singh. Upon instructions by the Informant, Mr. Sagar Bhadakwad prepared a loan file for the balance consideration amount of Rs.30,72,671/- in favor of the Informant.

i. Subsequently, on 13 February 2015, ICICI Bank, Bhandarkar Road, Pune approved the loan and transferred an amount of Rs. 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top