Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.M.Joshi
Anuj alias Babu Malhari Chavan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra Through P.I. Bhor Police Station – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under atrocities act. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal arguments about illegality of arrest detailed. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. opposition's arguments regarding fundamental rights. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis on procedural irregularity. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. examination of general diary entries evaluated. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. assessment of the time of arrest and travel. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. conclusion on legality and dismissal of appeal. (Para 14) |
| 8. final order of dismissal of appeal. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
R. M. Joshi, J.
1. This appeal filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “the Atrocities Act”), takes exception to the order dated 19th June 2025 passed by Special Judge, Pune in Special Case No.467 of 2025, whereby an application for bail in connection with Crime No.22 of 2025 registered with Bhor Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 238(c) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “the BNS ”) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Atrocities Act and Section 7 (1)(d) of Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 filed by the appellant/accused came to be rejected.
2. At the outset, it needs to be rec
Detention beyond 24 hours without presentation to a magistrate violates fundamental rights, but travel time is excluded in determining legality of arrest.
Arrest must be recognized from when an individual's liberty is restrained, and failure to produce before a magistrate within 24 hours constitutes illegal detention under constitutional provisions.
The court affirmed that the definition of arrest includes any situation where a person's liberty is restrained, and emphasized the constitutional and statutory obligation to produce an arrested perso....
The distinction between detention and formal arrest is crucial; detention during an investigation does not necessarily constitute an arrest unless it deprives the individual of liberty, affecting com....
The failure to obtain a transit warrant and produce the accused within 24 hours constitutes a violation of Article 22(2) of the Constitution, rendering the detention unlawful.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
