RAJEEV MISRA
Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
(Rajeev Misra, J.)
1. Heard Mr. Anoop Trivedi, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Ramesh Chandra Agrahari, the learned counsel for applicant-Asim @ Pappu Smart, Mr. Sayed Imran Ibrahim, the learned counsel for applicant-Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta, Mr. Manuraj Singh along with Mr. Prashant Kumar, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Rakesh Dubey, the learned counsel representing first informant/opposite party-2 in both the applications.
2. Perused the record.
3. Mr. Sayed Imran Ibrahim, the learned counsel for applicant-Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta submits that the application filed by aforesaid applicant has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. As such, on instructions received by him, he does not wish to press the application.
4. Learned A.G.A. for state and Mr. Rakesh Dubey, the learned counsel representing first informant/opposite party-2 have no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for applicant-Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta.
5. Consequently, Application under 482 Cr.P.C. No. 706 of 2021 (Manoj Gupta @ Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and another) is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
6. Criminal Misc. Application under sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.