SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MADHAV J.JAMDAR
Vasant Shenoy – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Animesh P. Gupta, Jay Varia
For the Respondent: Rahul Narichania

JUDGMENT :

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

1. Heard Mr. Animesh Gupta, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Rahul Narichania, learned Senior Counsel appointed as Amicus.

2. The reliefs sought in this Interim Application are as follows:

“a. To pass an Order/Direction towards Hon’ble Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay to issue a fresh certificate of sale in favour of the Applicant for the said property i.e. Flat no. 404, ILA Apartments, Section 4, RDP 7, Charkop, Kandivali West, Mumbai 400 067;

b. To pass an Order directing the Applicant to make payment of the Stamp Duty and Registration Charges with the concerned Sub-Registrar of Assurances and/or other concerned Government Authority for the said property i.e Flat no. 404, ILA Apartments, Section 4, RDP 7, Charkop, Kandivali West, Mumbai – 400 067, after receiving fresh certificate of sale from the office of Hon’ble Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

c. To pass an Order directing the Sheriff of Mumbai to handover the possession of the said property i.e. Flat no.404, ILA Apartments, Section 4, RDP 7, Charkop, Kandivali West, Mumbai – 400 067, to the Applicant Vasant N. Shenoy, on receipt of the copies of the paym

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top