Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANISH PITALE, SHREERAM V.SHIRSAT
Shekhar Champalal Pagaria through Proprietor – Appellant
Versus
CFM Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Manish Pitale, J.
The establishment of the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur has led to a specific question being raised on behalf of the petitioners to the effect that the present petition, originally filed and registered at the Principal Seat of this High Court, upon establishment of the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur ought to be transferred to the Circuit Bench. It is claimed that upon establishment of the Circuit Bench at Kolhapur and in the light of Rule 3A of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules (for short the 'said Rules'), the Principal Seat of this Court no longer has jurisdiction to consider and deal with this petition. The said question does not concern the merits of the present petition. But, a brief reference to the chronology of events leading upto filing of this petition becomes necessary to understand the context in which the rival submissions have been made.
2. The petitioner No.1 is a proprietary firm, which took certain credit facilities from Janata Sahakari Bank Limited, for which purpose petitioner Nos.2 to 4 mortgaged certain properties. The loan account was declared as 'NPA' and proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial. Assets and En
Principal Seat retains jurisdiction over writ challenging appellate tribunal order within its territory despite origin in Circuit Bench district; no ouster or mandatory transfer under Rule 3A as appe....
The territorial jurisdiction for hearing writ petitions under Article 227 is determined by the location of the original authority, not the appellate authority, as mandated by administrative rules.
The jurisdiction of a High Court under Article 227 pertains only to the Debts Recovery Tribunal located within its territorial limits, not an appellate tribunal for matters originating outside its ju....
The jurisdiction for challenging appellate tribunal orders lies in the High Court corresponding to the original tribunal's location, affirming the principle that appellate orders merge with original ....
The court established that the location of the Revisionary Authority and the doctrine of merger allow petitioners to file writs in the court where the authority is situated, affirming their right to ....
Jurisdiction of courts is determined by the location of the cause of action and convenience, not merely by where hearings are conducted.
Reading of section 260A(1) would go to show that an appeal shall lie to the High Court from “every order” passed in appeal by the Tribunal if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a subs....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
