SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 346



JUDGMENT :

JITENDRA JAIN, J.

1. This appeal was admitted on 23 August 2011 on following substantial question of law :-

“Whether, on admitted facts, the learned Judge of the Employees State Insurance Court (ESI Court) could have set aside the order passed under Section 85-B of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) ?”

2. On 10 January 2006, the appellant passed an order under Section 85-B of the ESI Act, levying damages of Rs.27,849/-. The respondent was given an opportunity of hearing before levying damages. The respondent made submissions for reduction/waiver of damages. The submissions being verbal request made to the recovery officer for payment in installments and that had they known that damages are to be paid they would have paid the entire contribution at one time in lumpsum by taking a loan. The appellant considered the said reply and passed a detailed order levying damages. The said order was challenged before the ESI Court by the respondent.

3. On 22 February 2010, the ESI Court quashed the above order to the extent that it levied damages of Rs.27,849/- by observing that the order under Section 85-B has been passed in a mechanical way without application of mind to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top