Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
FARHAN P.DUBASH
Jitendra Gorakh Megh – Appellant
Versus
Gorakh Govind Megh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.
1. The present Interim Application (IA), preferred under Section 105 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHA), has been filed by the Applicant/Plaintiff seeking the appointment of an independent Medical Board to examine and assess the mental condition of Defendant No. 1, who is the Applicant's father and who is alleged to be suffering from mental illness. At the outset, it is pertinent to note that several disputes, both civil and criminal are presently pending between the Applicant and Defendant No. 1 before various fora across Maharashtra and beyond. The captioned suit is one such proceeding, wherein the Applicant seeks a one-third share in the coparcenary/ancestral properties of Defendant No. 1.
2. By way of the present IA, the Applicant asserts that his father, Defendant No. 1 suffers from mental illness and, on that basis, challenges his mental competency and capacity to contest the captioned suit. In support of this contention, the Applicant relies upon a medical certificate issued by Metrocure Multispecialty Clinic and Diagnostic Centre (the Medical Certificate). The Applicant further alleges that he has been deliberately denied access to his fat
The court established that under the Mental Health Act, 1987, a judicial inquiry into the mental capacity of an individual is essential when there are allegations of mental incapacity affecting legal....
Point of Law : Section 105 of Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 deals with procedure to be followed in a judicial process where any proof of mental illness of a person is produced.
Insanity defense must be substantiated by adequate evidence of unsoundness at the time of offense; mere assertion is insufficient to shift the burden of proof.
The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 can be applied retrospectively, providing protections for individuals attempting suicide under severe stress, thus overriding previous criminal liabilities.
Accused's fitness to stand trial must be thoroughly examined, ensuring compliance with procedural requirements while allowing opportunity for defense representation.
The court has discretion under the Mental Health Act 2001 to order an inquiry into a person's mental capacity, requiring the applicant to establish a prima facie case of mental disorder.
The court has discretion under the Mental Health Act to order an inquiry into a person's mental capacity, requiring the establishment of a prima facie case by the applicant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
