SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 384



JUDGMENT:

KAMAL KHATA, J.

1) By the present Appeal, the Appellant seeks to set aside the impugned Order dated 7th May 2024 passed by City Civil Court, Dindoshi, in Notice of Motion No.2767 of 2019 in L.C. Suit No.1879 of 2019, whereby the Trial Court dismissed the said Notice of Motion.

2) The Notice of Motion taken out by the Appellant-Plaintiff sought an interim order to restrain the Defendant – Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (‘BMC’) from demolishing the Suit structure or any part thereof situated on M.G. road, Near Tilak Nagar Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai – 400 054.

FACTS & RIVAL SUBMISSIONS

3) Mr. Abhishek Tripathi, Advocate for the Appellant, submitted that the Appellant’s father had acquired the premises from one Shri Pandurang Gawade under an agreement dated 12th September 1986 for a sum of Rs.95,000/-. He submitted that in 1987, an application was made for transfer of electricity meter in Appellant’s name. He further submitted that the Additional Tahsildar had issued a Notice dated 3rd February 2012 under Section 45 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (‘MRTP Act’), which according to him establishes that the Suit premises was in existence prior to the datu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top