SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

I.P.SINGH
Pancham alias Bechan – Appellant
Versus
Sita Ram, State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties
Sh. Keshav Sahai, Advocate for the Applicant

JUDGMENT

I. P. Singh J. Pancham & Bechan applicant has filed this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C for getting quashed the entire proceedings pending u/s 145, Cr. P.C. in the court of S. D. M. Ballia in case No. 87 of 1983 (wrongly mentioned as no. 57 of 1983 in the application) and also for getting quashed the preliminary order dated 3-11-1983 and another order passed u/s 146 Cr. P.C. dated 31-12-1983 which confirmed attaching the property in dispute and appointing receiver thereof.

2. The matter is at admission stage though counter affidavit of Sita Ram, O.P.I. has been filed in pursuance of notice of court.

3. It appears that on the report of S.P.S. Baraiya, district Ballia dated 1.11.83, stating that there existed a dispute between the parties over a number of plots mentioned therein, situated in Bishanpura P.S. Baraiya, giving rise to an apprehension of breach of peace, SDM, Ballia passed preliminary order dated 3-11-1983 fixing 11.11.83 for filing written statements by the parties. On that date applicant Pancham @ Bechan did not appear and did not file written statement. He asserts he was not served for that date. The opposite-party Sita Ram heard on his application on that date an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top