SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.MISRA, B.K.BEHERA
Baar alias Ghasia Ho – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Sashibhushan Jena, Advocate - For the Appellant.
Mr. N. C. Panigrahi, Addl. G.A. - For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

B. K. Behera, J. - The appellant stands convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced there under to undergo imprisonment for life by the Court of Session after accepting the case of the prosecution that on November 9, 1980, sometime before evening, the appellant called his wife Janga (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased') for sexual intercourse and as she did not to inside the house, the appellant, by means of a Mugura (M.O. 1), dealt two blows on her forehead while she was plastering mud and cowdung outside her house which resulted in her death. The order of conviction has been based on the evidence of P.W. 1 Kanga Ho, the brother of the deceased, who had been examined as the sole witness to the occurrence and that of P.Ws. 3 and 4, two co-villagers, one of them (P.W. 3) being the headman of the village, with regard to an extrajudicial confession said to have been made by the appellant before them and P.W. 1 besides the recovery of M.O. 1 on the spot in the course of investigation. Mr. Jena, appearing for the appellant, challenges the order of conviction as legally unfounded having been based on false and tainted evidence while the learned Addit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top