SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P. Sen and E. S. Venkataramiah, JJ.
State of U.P. - Appellant
versus
Sukhbasi and others - Respondents
Criminal Appeals Nos. 267-270 of 1975
Decided on 10.5.1985

C. M. Lodha, Sr. Advocate. Dalveer Bhandari and H.M. Singh, Advocates - For the Appellant.
Frank Anthony, Sr. Advocate, Sushil Kumar and S.K. Bisaria, Advocates - For the Respondents.

IMPORTANT POINTS
(i) In a case in which the evidence is of a circumstantial nature, the facts and circumstances from which conclusion of guilt is sought to be drawn by the prosecution must be fully established beyond all reasonable doubt and the fact and circumstances so established should not only be consistent with the guilt of the accused, but they must be entirely in compatiable with the innocence of the accused and must exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with his innocence.
(ii) In cases where the prosecution evidence falls short of the proof required there, mere suspicion, however grave cannot take the place of proof.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code 1860, Sections 302/34 449, 460, 394, 411 and 120B-Evidence Act, Section 114 - Earlier respondents were convicted by the trial court for committing the murder of the deceased and for committing robbery - In Appeal High Court acquitted them from the alleged offences since the prosecution case against the respondents rested purely on circumstantial evidence and there was no legal evidence to sustain their conviction and the prosecution evidence falls short of the proof required - High Court drawn out serious infirmities in the prosecution case - Hence appeal - Whether the circumstantial evidence of this case was entirely incompatible with the innocence of the accused and was excluded every reasonable hypothesis consistent with his innocence? (No) - Whether the order of acquittal recorded by the High Court had caused a flagrant miscarriage of justice which warrants an interference? (No) (Paras 8, 11 to 14)

       Result :

       Appeal dismissed. (Para 15)

       

JUDGMENT

Sen, J. - These appeals by special leave are preferred by the State Government against the judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court dated May 25, 1973 acquitting the respondents Sukhbasi, Ram Sanehi and Ram Shanker of offences punishable under section 302 read with section 34 and under sections 449, 460 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the commission of which the Civil and Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad by his judgment dated September 21, 1972 had sentenced them to death on the first count and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years under the remaining three counts. The learned Sessions Judge had also convicted the respondent Chhotelal under section 411 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and the respondent Ashok Kumar under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years. These respondents have also been acquitted by the High Court for the commission of offences with which they were charged.

2. We have with the assistance of learned counsel appearing for the parties, gone through the judgment of the High Court as well as the evidence of the material prosecution witnesses. This was a case where during the night between December 25/26, 1970, there was a brutal and dastardly murder of Lala Bhagwat Dayal, a millionaire and his wife Smt. Ramwati Devi at their house in Chhibramau, They had been tied with rope and strangulated to death after being subject to torture. Lala Bhagwat Dhayal was the richest person of the town and earlier carried on the sarafa business, but had closed the business due to his old age and started lending money on pawn of gold and silver ornaments at his house. The miscreants broke open the iron safe kept in the bedroom of Bhagwat Dayal and removed all gold and silver ornaments worth about Rs. 10 lakhs and cash worth Rs. 22,424. The last persons to have seen Bhagwat Dayal alive were their servant Rameshwar, P.W. 7 and old Munim Bharat Singh, P.W. i8. Their version is that they both saw the respondents Sukhbasi and Ram Sanehi, two of the carpenters waking on the remodelled house of Bhagwat Dayal and their companion Ram Shanker entering the house as they left on the fateful evening at about 7.30 p.m. The respondents Sukhbasi and Ram Sanehi along with their companion Ram Shanker affected an entry into the house on the pretext that they wanted to pledge their ornaments. On the next morning at about 7 a.m. Rameshwar, P.W. 7 reported for duty but found the sadar door still closed from inside although the deceased Bhagwat Dayal was an early riser and used to open it much earlier. Shortly thereafter, the other carpenter Sheo Murti, P.W. 15 also came for work. On finding no response they were apprehensive that something untoward had happened and Rameshwar immediately left for the house of Gajadhar Prasad, brother of the deceased, nearby and reported this to him and his sons Chandra Prakash, P.W. 28 and Ram Prakash. On hearing this, Ram Prakash returned with Rameshwar, P.W. 7 and again raised shouts but still there was no response. The two of them claimed over the roof of the house of Bakshiji and from that roof they went over to the roof of the deceased's house and finding the door of the staircase open which was rather unusual they descended over the flight of the stairs and came to the ground floor. They entered the living room and found the furniture and other effects scattered about. They further noticed that in the bedroom though the beds were still spread over the cots the deceased Bhagwat Dayal and his wife Smt. Ramwati Devi were not to be found. In the meantime, Gajadhar Prasad and his son Chandra Prakash and other inmates of their house also arrived on the scene. They noticed that the anteroom next to the living room had been locked from outside and felt suspicious that perhaps some persons had intruded into the house the "previous night and after murdering the old couple decamped

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top