SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.N.BHARGAVA, S.K.SHARMA
Nasru – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bhargava, J -This revision petition has been filed challenging the conviction and sentences passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Alwar, under section 304-A I.P.C.

2. This revision petition came up for admission. Learned Single Judge (Mrs. Kapur J.) was of the opinion that it does not call for any interference in revision with regard to the merits of the Case but she admitted the revision petition on the ground of sentence in view of a decision of this Court in Amar Lal v. State of Rajasthan1. When this revision petition came up for final disposal before Hon'ble V.S. Dave, J. after hearing the arguments at length, he passed detailed order dated 27-7-87 referring the following question for consideration by the larger bench:

“Whether the decision in the aforesaid case lays down a general proposition that in all automobile accident cases there should not be a lesser punishment than one year's imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 15,000/-.

Therefore; this matter has "come” up 'before" us. Since this is a very important question, we though it proper to issue notice to 1 he learned counsels, inviting them if they wanted to submit arguments on the above question.

3. We have he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top