SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAMANUJULU NAIDU, IYYAPU PANDURANGA RAO
M. A. Dharman – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramanujulu Naidu, J. - In this batch of Writ Petitions filed for issue of writs of habeas corpus, directing the respondents to produce before this Court, respectively, (1) Anwar Ismail, s/o Ismail, (2) Dawood Mohammed, s/o Siddiqui, (3) Dawood, s/o Yusuf, (4) Ishaq, s/o Omar, (5) Baktar Ahmad Mujawar Khan, s/o Mujawar Khan, (6) Kasim Mohammed s/o Shaik Mohammed, (7) Abdullah Usman, s/o Usman, (8) Mossa, s/o Ibrahim, and (9) Rafi, s/o Abdullah, presently undergoing detention as remanded prisoners in the Central Prison, Visakhapatnam, hereinafter referred to, for the sake of convenience, as "the detenus" and to set them at liberty, an important question of law as to the interpretation of Section 167(2) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the consequences that flow from contravention of or non-compliance with, the provisions of the said section arises for consideration.

2. The facts giving rise to the filing of the batch of writ petitions lie in a narrow compass and may briefly be stated. All the detenus are Helpers and Sailors employed in an Arab Dhow. It sailed towards the coastal sea in the State of Andhra Pradesh and it was intercepted at the coast near Narsapur by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top