S.D.JHA
Griraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhay Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.D. Jha, J. - Convict-appellant Giriraj (hereinafter called 'the accused') by judgment dated 13.9.1991 in S.T. No. 230 of 1990 delivered by the first Additional Sessions Judge Neemuch District Mandsaur has been convicted under section 8/18 of the Narcotics Drugs and Physchotrophic Substances Act 1985 (hereinafter called 'the Act') and sentenced to under go rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of rupees one lac, in default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for two years. By this application under section 389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter called 'the Code') read along with Section 36-B of the Act prays for suspension of execution of sentence and release on bail.
2. At the hearing of the application Shri Brijesh Pandya learned counsel for the accused, relying on order dated 25.3 .1991 in Rameshwar v. The State1 passed by a Single Judge of this Court (Hon. Shri M.W. Deo J.) submitted that inspite of newly introduced section 32-A in the Act, it was competent for this Court to order suspension of execution of sentence even in case of conviction for an offence other than under section 27 of the Act. For the same purpose
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.