SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.N.RAO, S.DASARADHA RAMA REDDY
P. Nedumaran – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.N. Rao, J. - These two Habeas Corpus applications are interconnected facts alleged and questions of law arising for consideration also are common part from the fact that the petitioner is the same and so, we are inclined to dispose of both the cases by this common judgment.

2. The petitioner-Sri. P. Nedumaran-swears that he is a former member of the Tamilnadu Legislative Assembly and a supporter of the cause of the Sri. Lankan Tamils. He claims that the mother of Captain V. Jayachandran, one of the detenus, instructed him to file. W.P. No. 3792 of f993 and the other detenus also instructed him through his counsel, Sri. S. Dorai Swamy, who interviewed them on 5.3.1993 at Visakhapatnam, to file the writ petition.

3. W.P. No. 37920f1993 was filed for release of nine accused- (1) M/s. V. Jayachandran, (2) K Satkunalingam, (3) V. Krishnamoorty, (4) K Nayagan, (5) S. Sivarajan, (6) S. Indalingam, (7) A Subhash Chandran, (8) S. Balakrishnan and (9) T. Mohan - against whom F.I.R was registered by the Harbour Police Station, Vishapatnam in Crime No. 4 of 1993 under section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, sections 3 and 4 of the Te

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top