P.K.BAHRI, J.B.GOEL
Virender Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P.K. Bahri, J.- Virender Kumar Yadav and Mukhtiar Yadav @ Mukho Yadav @ Raju have been convicted of offences punishable under Section 302- read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and under Section 201 read with Section 34 of the IPC by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi vide his judgment dated August 28,1991 and by subsequent order of the even date they have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month each for the first count and have been also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month each on the second count. They have come up in appeal challenging their convictions and sentences.
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that Ashok since deceased. PW6 Gogan Yadav and PW7 Rajinder had come to Delhi for earning their livelihood from their village Sakra Paharpur. P.O. Simribak Tungar Pur, District Saharsa (Bihar). Ashok was working as a labourer in Cannaught Place area whereas PW6 and PW7 were playing rickshaws at the relevant time.
Kashmira Singh v. State of MP; AIR 1952 SC 159.
Thimma v. State of Mysore; AIR 1971 SC 1871.
Union of India v. Raghubir Singh; AIR 1989 SC 1933.
Piara Singh v. State of Punjab; AIR 1977 SC 2274.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. M.K. Anthony; AIR 1985 SC 48.
Madan Gopal Kakkad v. Naval Dubey & Anr.; (1992)3 SCC 204.
Mulk Raj v. State of UP; AIR 1959 SC 902.
Kishore Chand v. State of HP; AIR 1990 SC 2140.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.