M.M.PAREED PILLAY, T.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, P.SHANMUGAM
Hareendran – Appellant
Versus
Sarada – Respondent
ORDER
Pareed Pillay, A.cg. C.J. - The Crl. M.C. is to quash a complaint filed by the first respondent before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Ottapalam for offence under Section 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'). Magistrate took cognizance of the of-fence. Contention of the petitioner is that the Magistrate ought to have seen that he has no jurisdiction to initiate committal proceedings and hence initiation of the same cannot be sustained.
2. In view of the contention that the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offence under the Act, Thomas J. held that principles laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Re.: 1992(2) KLT 7481 require reconsideration. The matter was posted before a Division Bench of this Court and that Court referred the case to be heard by a Full Bench of this Court.
3. The question that arises for consideration is whether committal proceedings is, necessary or not in a case under the Act. In Re: 1992(2) KLT 748, a Division Bench of this Court held that the Sessions Judge as Special Court constituted under the Act can take cognizance of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.