SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RANGASAMY
R. Kasthuri Radhakrishnan, Chairperson Madras Citizens, Progressive Council – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police – Respondent


ORDER

Rengasamy, J. - These petitions have been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to quash the order of compromise recorded in C.C. Nos. 1923 to 1925 of 1989 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Madras.

2. The allegations in these three petitions are common. The petitioner claiming to be the Social Worker for the uplift of women and as the Chair person of the Madras Citizens Progressive Council has filed these petitions mentioning them as public interest litigations to protect the interest of the another sex. The second respondent is a cine actor. Three girls by names, Lakshmi, Beena and Sheela lodged complaints against the 2nd respondent individually in May, 1985. The complainant Lakshmi alleged that the 2nd respondent had committed the offences under Sections 420, 376 and 354 of Indian Penal Code on her. Whereas the second complainant Beena alleged that the second respondent had committed the offences under Sections 420, 354 and 506 Part II of the Indian Penal Code. The 3rd complainant Sheela alleged the offences under Section 420, 376, 307, 506 Part II and 292-A of Indian Penal Code against the 2nd respondent. Though very serious allegations were made

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top