SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.P.KURDUKAR, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Kamta Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhay Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Anil Kumar Gupta, Advocate (AC).
For the Respondent:Uma Nath Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

M.K. Mukherjee, J. - The appellant was tried for the convicted of offences punishable under Sections 363, 376, 302 and 201 IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdol. For his conviction under Section 302 IPC, he was sentenced to death and for the other convictions to different terms of rigorous imprisonment. As the appeal preferred by him in the High Court was dismissed, he has filed the instant appeal after obtaining special leave.

2. Briefly stated the case of the prosecution is as follows:

(a) Parmeshwar Lal Sharma (PW 1) along with his wife and three children used to reside at Bhutari Tolla in the township .of Budhar. Of the three children, Pinky (the deceased) was the youngest arid her age at the time of her death was about seven years. The appellant who was also a resident of the same locality used to occasionally visit the family of Parmeshwar and his children used to address him as 'Tiwari Uncle'.

(b) On April 30, 1995 at or about 6 P.M; Parmeshwar had gone to a hair cutting saloon in the local market along with his son Santosh (PW 4) and daughter Pinky. After Santosh and Pinky had their hair cut they went out of the saloon to play outside while Parmeshwar staye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top