K.T.THOMAS, D.P.WADHWA, M.M.PUNCHHI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat – Respondent
Order
M.M. Punchhi, CJI. - While concluding his opinion my learned brother K.T. Thomas, J. has made certain directions to the respective governments to which conclusion my learned brother D.P. Wadhwa, J. in his separate opinion has accorded assent. I too would accord approval to those directions and order disposal of these appeals and writ petitions.
Judgment
Thomas, J. - A delicate Issue requiring very circumspective approach is mooted before us: Whether prisoners, who are required to do labour as part of their punishment, should necessarily be paid wages for such work at the rates prescribed under Minimum Wages law. We have before us appeals filed by some State Governments challenging the judgments rendered by the respective High Courts which in principle upheld the contention that denial of wages at such rate would fringe on infringement of the constitutional protection against execution of forced labour.
2. Shri Rajeev Dhawan, senior counsel put before us the view points of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) which favours the principle that prisoners should be paid wages at the rates prescribed under the Minimum Wages law. On the request of this Court Shri Kapil Sibal,
People’s Union of Democratic Rights v. Union of India
Bhuvan Mohan Patnaik v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Express Newspapers Ltd. v. Union of India
Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka
Poola Bhaskara Vijayakumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan
Olga Tellis & Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Jagmohan Singh v. The State of U.P.
Palaniappa Gounder v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.