SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.B.SAKRIKAR
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sakrikar, J. - This is an application filed by the applicant u/Section 438, Cr. P.C. on the allegation that he apprehends his arrest in Crime No. 23/1998, registered at Scheduled Caste Kalyan Prakosth, Jhabua u/Sections 341,294. IPC and Section 3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

2. It is stated on behalf of the prosecution that as the case is registered against the applicant under the provisions of S.C. & S.T. Act, therefore, in view of Section 18 of the said Act, the application under Section 438, Cr. P.C. is not maintainable.

3. Learned Counsel for appellant submitted that in view of the allegations alleged against the applicant primafacie do not constitute an offence u/Section 3(1)(10) of the said Act. As such the bar created u/Section 18 of the said Act shall not apply for consideration of the application filed by the applicant u/Section 438. Cr. P.C. Learned Counsel relied on the decisions of this Court in cases of Kalyan Singh v. State of M.P.1 and Bablu v. State of M.P.2. The learned Counsel also contended that the present applicant is a Government servant and is posted as Veternary Doctor at Veternary Hospital

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top