SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(MP) 525

SHACHEENDRA DWIVEDI
Kalyan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
B. Raj Sharma for applicant; M.K. Jain, Deputy Govt. Advocate for State.

JUDGMENT

The applicant apprehends his arrest in Crime No. 20/95 registered for the offences under sections 294, 323, I.P.C. and section 3 (1) (x) of S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The report of the incident was lodged by the complainant after more than two days. At this stage, I do not wish to make any expression about the merits. However, considering the detailed report prima facie at this stage it does not appear that the alleged offence was committed against the complainant for his belonging to S.C. or S.T. and the accusation against the applicant is under clouds, due to the delayed report. In the facts and circumstances, a bar created by section 18 of the Act, is not attracted.

The applicant is directed to be released on bail In the event of his arrest on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 5,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Police Officer competent to arrest under section 438, Cr.P.C.

C.C. by to-morrow.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top