SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Teja Ram – Respondent


Judgment

Thomas, J.—It was by a midnight blitz that two sleeping inmates of a dwelling house were axed to death by armed assailants. One of the victims was the old mother of the other victim. The younger among them was not the target of the assailants but he was mistaken for his brother. In the Sessions court seven persons were put on trial as the assailants in the aforesaid double murder episode. Out of them six were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code and for certain other lesser but allied offences. They were sentenced to imprisonment for life for the principal offence and for lesser terms for the lesser offences. When they appealed a Division Bench of the Court of Rajasthan set aside the conviction and sentence and acquitted them all. State of Rajasthan has, therefore, come up in appeal to this Court by special leave.

2. As there were seven accused in the case, out of which six are the respondents now, they can be referred to as accused in the same rank as they were arrayed in the trial Court so that possible mistake in identifying them can be prevented. A1 Teja Ram, A2 Ram Lal and A3 Bhanwar Lal are the sons of one Maga Ram and they are c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top