SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN, G.SASIDHARAN
Joseph Kuzhijalil – Appellant
Versus
Joseph Pulikunnel – Respondent


ORDER

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J. - The question raised in this proceeding filed invoking Art 215 of the Constitution of India and Sections. 10, 12 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is whether this proceeding is maintainable at the instance of the petitioner on the ground that what, is alleged is a criminal contempt of the Subordinate Court and the sanction sought for by the petitioner before the Advocate - General under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Section 10 thereof was refused by the Advocate - General. The Registry returned the papers to the petitioner by seeking a clarification whether the Contempt of Court case is maintainable in view of the dismissal of the petition for sanction by the learned Advocate - General. Counsel for the petitioner represented the petition with the endorsement that the sanction of the Advocate - General was not necessary in the light of the decision of the Division Bench in Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee v. Pritish Nand1 and Another (O.P. No. 7352 of 1985 (Contempt). Counsel also stated that if that explanation was not acceptable the matter may be sent to the Court for decision. The Deputy Registrar noticing t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top