SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

U.S.TRIPATHI
Subhash Chandra Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

U.S. Tripathi, J. - This revision has been directed against the judgment and order dated 6-11-2001 passed by Additional Sessions Judge. Court No. 14, Varanasi, in Criminal Appeal No. 145 of 2000, dismissing the appeal of the applicant against the judgment and order dated 19-6-2001, passed by IVth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, in Criminal Case No. 380 of 2000, convicting the applicant under Section 14(1) Child Labour (Prevention and Regulation) Act, 1986 and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for a period of three months.

2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that on 25-1-1994 at about 3 P.M. Sri Rampreet Ram, Labour Enforcement Officer under Child Labour (Prevention and Regulation) Act, 1986, hereinafter called the Act, visited the establishment of applicant and found that one Ashok Prajapati aged about 11 years of village Kawal, P.S. Gyanpur, was employed as labour to work in the said establishment. The, above act of the applicant was against the provisions of Section 3 of the Act. He prepared spot note and obtained signature of the child labour on it. The applicant was not present at the time of inspection and his nephew Binod Kumar was supervising

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top