SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

N.S.HEGDE, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Bhupan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Judgment

Santosh Hegde, J.—The appellant herein and five others were sent for trial before the First Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No. 159 of 1984 on a charge under Section 302 IPC and in the alternate under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC for having caused the death of one Shamim on 10th of March, 1984 around 9.45 p.m. The learned Sessions Judge while acquitting five of the accused persons convicted the appellant herein of an offence under Section 302 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life. The appellant preferred an appeal before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 225 of 1988. The said appeal came to be dismissed by the judgment of the High Court dated 9th of March, 1999. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and conviction, the appellant has preferred this appeal.

2. The appellant is represented by Shri Anip Sachthey, learned Advo­cate of this Court who is appointed as an Amicus Curiae and the re­spondent by Ms. Geetanjali Mohan.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 10th of March, 1984, at about 9.30 p.m., the appellant along with six other persons caused as many as 23 injuries on Shamim, consequent to wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top