C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
T. Aparna – Appellant
Versus
Rukmini Leasing Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
C.Y. Somayajulu, J.-On a report given on behalf of the first respondent to the Inspector of Police. Ramachandrapuram. Medak District alleging that in pursuance of an agreement between the first respondent and Sri Engineering Works. represented by its Proprietor Smt. T. Aparna. (i.e., petitioner herein) first respondent financed the petitioner to purchase machinery and equipment worth about Rs. 5 lakhs, and that as per the terms of the said agreement first respondent as owner is entitled to repossess the machinery purchased under the agreement and the petitioner removed the said machinery from its premises and so necessary action may be taken. The said report was registered as a case in Cr. No. 255 of 1999 under Sections 406 and 409 I.P.C. and investigation was taken up. At that stage petitioner filed Crl. P. No. 944 of 2000 in this Court to quash the FIR on the ground that the FIR does not disclose commission of any offence by her. This Court by its order dated 22-6-2000 dismissed he said petition on the ground that the FIR police after investigation filed chargesheet against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 406 and 409 I.P.C. which was taken on file by the Judic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.