DORAISWAMY RAJU, S.B.SINHA
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Sujit Kumar Rana – Respondent
Judgment
S.B. Sinha, J.—
Introduction
Applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing a proceeding for confiscation of forest-produce etc. under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) as amended by the State of West Bengal is in question in these appeals which arise out of a common judgment and order dated 27.6.1996 passed by the Calcutta High Court.
Background Fact
2. Shortly stated, the fact of the matter is that the forest-produce belonging to the State and/or the vehicles carrying the same were seized by the Forest Officer. The report of such seizure was made to the authorized officer.
3. Except Criminal Appeal No. 453 of 1997 - State of West Bengal and Ors. Vs. Sujit Kumar Rana, show cause notices issued by the forest authority purported to be issued under the provision of Section 59-B of the Act, as amended by the State of West Bengal or the seizure of the forest-produce or the vehicles carrying the same, came to be questioned by the respondents before the Calcutta High Court invoking its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In Sujit Kumar Rana’s case, however, an order of
Divisional Forest Officer and Another v. G.V. Sudhakar Rao and Others
Indian Handicrafts Emporium & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Balram Kumawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The State of Bihar & Anr. v. Kedar Sao & Anr.
State of West Bengal v. Gopal Sarkar
State of Karnataka v. K.A. Kunchindammed
Shambhu Dayal Agarwala v. State of West Bengal and Another
Deputy Commissioner, Dakshina Kannada District v. Rudolph Fernandes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.