A.K.GOHIL, S.S.JHA
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Brij and five others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. Gohil, J. — Both the aforesaid appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 20-8-1994 passed in Sessions Trial No. 259/92. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 188/94 and Criminal Appeal No. 58/95. In Sessions Trial No. 259/92, eight accused persons were tried. Vide judgment dated 20-8-1994, III Additional Sessions Judge, Morena convicted Govind S/o Soneram under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to imprisonment for life against which Govind has filed Criminal Appeal No. 188/94 challenging his conviction and sentence and acquitted the rest of the accused persons namely Brij S/o. Soneram, Soneram S/o Gangaram, Ramnivas S/o Lajjaram, Durga S/o Soneram, Kalicharan S/o Lajjaram, Kaladhar S/o Lajjaram and Maniram S/o Lajjaram and against the acquittal of the aforesaid accused persons, State has filed Criminal Appeal No. 58/95 after obtaining leave from this Court. Both these appeals have been heard together and they are being decided by this common judgment.
2. In short, the prosecution story is that on 19-8-1992 at about 9 AM in the morning, when complainant Kamlesh S/o Vrindavan, his brother Girraj, Bablu, Satish, Ashok and cousin Ramni
Lakshmi Singh v. State of Bihar
Jassa Singh v. State of Haryana
Mohd. Aman v. State of Rajasthan
Modan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Santa Singh v. State of Punjab
Sucha Singh and another v. State of Punjab
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
Balaka Singh v. State of Punjab
Marudanal Augusti v. State of Kerala
State of A.P. v. Punati Ramulu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.