SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.B.SINHA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
B. Suresh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Sharifa Bee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. —

1. Leave granted.

2. An application for quashing the complaint being CC No.216 of 2006 filed in the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Malkagiri filed the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been dismissed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh by reason of the impugned judgment.

3. Basic fact of the matter is not in dispute.

4. First respondent herein filed a complaint petition. The parties hereto entered into an agreement for sale in respect of a house admeasuring 350 square yards for a consideration of Rs.23,80,000/-. A sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- was paid by way of advance. A sale deed was executed on 30.9.2005 by the appellant herein on receipt of the balance sum of Rs. 18,79,000/-.

5. Indisputably on or about 29.9.2005, two rooms, allegedly, constructed on the said lands were demolished. A suit was filed in relation thereto. Respondent No.1 was also defendant in the said suit. In the written statement, she stated :

“Whereas it is the Plaintiffs who by demolishing existing structure when the defendant No.2 and her family members are away and even the electricity connection meter was thrown away and in that regard

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top