SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, SURESH KAIT
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shraddha Bhargava, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Richa Kapoor, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.—Appellant Mukesh faced trial for the charge of having murdered his wife Anita (hereinafter referred to as the “Deceased”) on 23.4.2004 at around 2:00 PM in the matrimonial house of the parties being Flat No.55, Pocket IV, Sector-21 , Rohini, Delhi.

2. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 01.10.2007, the appellant has been held guilty of murder for which offence he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine in sum of Rs.1 0,000/-; in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months.

3. Case of the prosecution against the appellant was that on 23.04.2004 at about 2.45 PM the appellant came to PS Sultanpuri and informed HC Dilbagh Singh PW-8 that along with his wife and his three children the appellant resides at flat bearing Municipal No.55, Pocket IV, Sector 21, Rohini, Delhi and that his sister Krishna and her husband Bhanu reside in the flat opposite to his house. That since last few days the deceased was having illicit relations with his brother-in-law Bhanu. That he requested the deceased to end her relationship with Bhanu but she did not pay any heed to his requests. That today i.e. 23.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top