PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, SURESH KAIT
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.—Appellant Mukesh faced trial for the charge of having murdered his wife Anita (hereinafter referred to as the “Deceased”) on 23.4.2004 at around 2:00 PM in the matrimonial house of the parties being Flat No.55, Pocket IV, Sector-21 , Rohini, Delhi.
2. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 01.10.2007, the appellant has been held guilty of murder for which offence he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine in sum of Rs.1 0,000/-; in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months.
3. Case of the prosecution against the appellant was that on 23.04.2004 at about 2.45 PM the appellant came to PS Sultanpuri and informed HC Dilbagh Singh PW-8 that along with his wife and his three children the appellant resides at flat bearing Municipal No.55, Pocket IV, Sector 21, Rohini, Delhi and that his sister Krishna and her husband Bhanu reside in the flat opposite to his house. That since last few days the deceased was having illicit relations with his brother-in-law Bhanu. That he requested the deceased to end her relationship with Bhanu but she did not pay any heed to his requests. That today i.e. 23.
Bheru Singh v. State of Rajasthan
State of U.P. v. Deoman Upadhyay
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan
Amarsingh Munnasingh Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra
Ganeshlal v. State of Maharashtra
Prabhudayal v. State of Maharashtra
Dynaneshwar v. State of Maharashtra
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra
State of Tamil Nadu v. Rajendran
State of U.P. v. Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.