SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PIYUSH MATHUR
Kirti Prakash Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shishir Saxena, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mukund Bhardwaj, PP, Mr. N.P. Dwivedi, Advocate.

ORDER

Piyush Mathur, J.—This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter for short the “Code”) is preferred against an Order dated 2.8.2008 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Guna, in Criminal Revision No.401/07, which arose out of an Order dated 4.10.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guna, in Criminal Case No.363/2006, wherein the Courts below, while examining the provisions of Sections 177 and 178 of the Code, have found that in spite of accrual of Cause of Action at Bhopal, the Criminal Court at Guna has the jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offences, punishable under Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (hereinafter for short the “Act”).

2. The facts of the case demonstrate that the complainant Smt. Archana Saxena got married with present Petitioner Kirti Prakash Saxena at Bhopal on 18.3.2003 and she resided at Bhopal uptill Date 12.11.2004 and on account of continuing cruelty by her in- laws, Smt. Archana Saxena left the matrimonial home, on her own and reached the house of her parents at Guna.

3. Smt. Archana Saxena has submitted a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guna, prayi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top