N.A.BRITTO
Sulochana Vaz – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard.
2. The petitioners are the accused against whom charge under Section 379 r/w 34 I.P.C. has been ordered to be framed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Margao.
3. The petitioners having filed a revision against the said Order to the Court of Session, the same came to be dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge by Order dated 18.1.2010. The petitioners therefore have now filed the present petition for quashing and setting aside the FIR filed against them so also the orders dated 23.9.2009 and 18.1.2010 of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and the Sessions Judge, respectively.
4. The petitioners are the sisters of respondent No.2 who is their only brother. They belong to a family of three sisters and one brother. Maria Judith has initiated inventory proceedings upon the death of their parents by application dated 25.9.1998 and Order dated 29.9.1998 their brother Respondent No.2 was appointed as the Administrator-Cabeca de Casal in the said inventory proceedings, and the fact remains that till date i.e. for over a decade no list of properties have been filed by him in the said inventory proceedings.
5. On 17.4.2008 regarding the incident of plucking of man
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.