SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDRANI DATTA
Mewalal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Shri Sanjay Bahirani, Advocate.
For the Respondent/State: Shri T.C. Bansal, Public Prosecutor.

ORDER

Indrani Dutta, J.—Heard. With the consent of parties, matter is finally heard at motion hearing stage itself.

2. Applicant has filed this revision under Section 397/401 of CrPC for setting aside the order dated 6.8.2010 passed in M.J.C. No.1237/2001 by JMFC Lahar, District Bhind whereby application submitted by the applicant under Section 451/457 CrPC for releasing the vehicle Tractor & Trolley bearing registration No. MP 06A-7066 has been dismissed.

3. Laconically, the fact of the case are that on 15.4.2010 on the basis of information received that Wheat which was to be distributed as per PDS Scheme is illegally unloaded in the premises of co-accused Ashok Singh for the purpose of black-marketing. Tehsildar Revenue Inspector and Patwari reached on spot and recovered Tractor and Trolely No. MP/06A7066 carrying 40 quintal of Wheat the also recovered one Matador bearing No. MP 30H0186 which never reaches its destination. The tractor and Trolley bearing registration No. MP06A7066 along with 40 quintal Wheat has been seized and FIR concerning Crime No.36/2010 has been registered against the applicant and other co-accused under Sections 379, 408. 420 IPC read with Section 3/7 of E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top