SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RADHE SHYAM SHARMA
Gangabai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Smt. Indira Tripathi, Advocate.
For the Respondent/State:Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Radhe Shyam Sharma, J.—This appeal is directed against judgment dated 7.7.1997 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Special Sessions Trial No.136/1996. By the impugned judgment, accused/appellant Gangabai has been convicted under Section 20B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (henceforth ‘the Act, 1985’) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under:

On 19.10.1996, Assistant Sub-Inspector Gulabdas (PW2), on receiving secret information that the appellant had Ganja in her possession and was engaged in selling the same illegally, he recorded the secret information and communicated it to his superior police officers and thereafter went to the spot along-with Assistant Sub-Inspector M.L. Ajgale (PW5), Head Constable and Constable and witnesses Parasram (PW3) and K.B. Tiwari (PW4). At the time when they reached the house of the appellant, she was present in her house. The appellant was informed about her right under Section 50 of the Act, 1985 vide Ex.P4 and consent of the appellant rega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top