SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 254

S. RAJENDRA BABU, K. T. THOMAS, A. S. ANAND
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Thomas, J.-Appellant was an auto-rickshaw driver. On the evening of 12.1.1988 an auto-rickshaw was intercepted by a posse of police personnel while it was proceeding to Shahpur (Gujarat). Four gunny bags were found stacked in the vehicle. They contained Charas (Cannabis hemp). Appellant was arrested and prosecuted for offences under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (1985) (for short the Act ) besides Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act.

2. The trial Court acquitted the appellant, but on appeal by the State of Gujarat a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat set aside the order of acquittal and convicted him of the offences under the above sections. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine of Rupees one lakh for the first count while no separate sentence was imposed for the second count.

3. Facts are not seriously disputed by the appellant. More details about the facts are the following :

PW-2 Premsingh M. Vishen, Inspector of Police at Dariapur Police Station, got information on 12.1.1988 that one Iqbal Syed Husen was trying to transport Charas upto Shahpur in an auto-rickshaw bearing No. GTH












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top