DIPAK MISRA, B.S.CHAUHAN
Narender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.-These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 25.3.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.53 of 2000, by which it has affirmed the judgment and order of the trial Court dated 7.12.1999 passed in Sessions Case No. 77/99, convicting the appellant under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called ‘IPC’) and awarded the punishment of rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years vide order dated 8.12.1999 and imposed a fine of Rs.2000.
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that:
(A) Smt. Indira PW.1 (prosecutrix) filed an FIR No.886/98 dated 16.9.1998 to the effect that when she was going from village Khirki to Chirag Delhi on that day at about 8 p.m., the appellant met her near Ganda Nala, he caught hold of her hand and dragged her towards the bushes on the edge of the road and committed rape on her. She could not raise the noise due to fear. After commission of the offence, the appellant left her there and ran away. The prosecutrix went to her husband at his working place and from there went to the police station alongwith her husband to lodge the FIR.
(
Vimal Suresh Kamble v. Chaluverapinake Apal S.P.
Vishnu v. State of Maharashtra
Suresh N. Bhusare v. State of Maharashtra
Jai Krishna Mandal v. State of Jharkhand
Rajoo v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Tameezuddin @ Tammu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh
State of U.P. v. Pappu @ Yunus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.