SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.P.Bangarh
Noor Mohd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

S.P. Bangarh, J.—The case of the prosecution is that on 17.9.1989, Maha Singh the then Assistant Sub-Inspector of police station City Panipat at about 3.00 p.m. along with other police officials, was present near Adarsh Udyog Factory Panipat situated along side G.T. road, where Ramesh Chand PW met the police party and was joined in the police party. Immediate, thereafter appellant along with a woman was seen coming on foot along side G.T. road from Delhi side carrying a bag Ex. P1 in his right hand, who on seeing the police party changed their directions towards east, that aroused suspicion in the mind of Maha Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, who apprehended the appellant and Munni Bai and told them that they are to be searched, in case, they so desired, the same could be done in the presence of some Gazetted Officer. Both, the appellant and Munni Bai opted to be searched without the presence of a Gazetted Officer, by Maha Singh, the then ASI (Supra) and the latter searched the appellant, that resulted into a bag Ex. P1 containing 4 Kgs of opium wrapped in a polythene paper. The appellant could not produce any permit, therefor. 200 grams of opium were drawn as a sample from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top