SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.SHUKLA, SHASHI KANT
Amar Nath Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Pushkar Srivastava & Mr. Manish Tandon, Advocates.
For the Respondents: AGA.

JUDGMENT

Amar Nath Pandey, S/o Baijnath Pandey has approached this Court with following prayers:

“(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 30.01.2014 passed by respondent no. 3/Circle Officer, Sadar, Chandauli and to letter dated 24.12.2013 of respondent no. 2 in Case Crime No. 255 of 2013 under Sections 306, 506 and 120-B IPC Police Station-Chandauli district Chandauli.

(b) Issue the writ of mandamus commanding the respondent police authorities, not to arrest or harass the petitioner.”

2. Brief background of the case as is emanating from the record of the writ petition is that a FIR was lodged, in reference of an incident alleged to have taken place on 18.10.2013 at about 13.05 hours by Ramakant Tiwari which was registered as Case Crime No. 255 of 2013 under Section 306, 506 and 120-B IPC Police Station- Chandauli district Chandauli against the petitioner as well as Gajanand Pandey @ Anand Pandey, who is son in law of Ramakant Tiwari. In the said criminal case, investigation has been carried out and thereafter Investigating Officer vide Parcha No. 6 dated 08.01.2014 concluded that petitioner was not involved in aforesaid crime in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top