RAJIV SHARMA
Bitu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Sharma, J.— This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 12.10.2006 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P., in Sessions Trial No.23/2003, 66/2005, whereby accused/appellant, namely, Bitu Ram, was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000 and in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.l,000 and in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that during August 2000, PW3 prosecutrix was present in her house. The accused came to her house at about 6.00 p.m. and committed rape on her. The accused also threatened her with dire consequences in case she disclosed the incident to anybody. The prosecutrix conceived and after a period of about 5-6 months, PW4 Soma Devi, mother of the prosecutrix on getting
Deelip Singh alias Dilip Kumar v. State of Bihar
Yedla Srinivasa Rao v. State of A.P.
Raju and Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chhotey Lal
Ramdas and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana
State of Andhra Pradesh v. M. Madhuudhan Rao
Rajesh Patel v. State of Jharkhand
State of H.P. v. Shree Kant Shekari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.