SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.DAS
Milan Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P. Roy Barman, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. A. Ghosh, P.P.

JUDGMENT

S.C. Das, J.—This revisional application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of CrPC is directed against judgment and order dated 13.06.2007, passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in Criminal Appeal No.6(1) of 2007, whereunder, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge upheld the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, dated 13.02.2007 passed by learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dharmanagar, in case No.G.R.448 of 2005 under Section 420 of IPC.

Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate found the accused-petitioner, Smt. Milan Paul guilty of the charge framed against her under Section 420 of IPC and sentenced her to suffer SI for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer SI for three months.

2. Heard learned counsel, Mr. P. Roy Barman for the petitioner and learned P.P., Mr. A. Ghosh for the State respondent.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant (complainant), Manmohan Dutta (PW1) is the proprietor of a shop, namely ‘M/s Bhagabati Bhander’ at Dharmanagar East Market. Sri Bishnupada Deb, husband of the accused-petitioner, Smt. Milan Paul was a retailer of the shop of Manmohan Dutta and in that conne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top